What happens on the fourth day?

What happens on the fourth day?


  • Tag Archives Wonder Woman
  • Justice League Movie Plot and Cast (according to Fourth-day)

    So, last week, SheKnows Entertainment posted a potential roster for the Justice League movie.  Speculation for which heroes would appear in the movie is almost as hot as which actors would take on the roles.  Well, in this article, we’re going to address both.

     

    As most of you may know, even the Justice League’s core roster has gone through several changes over the decades, most recently during the “New 52″ comic continuity reboot.  Some things we can take for granted about the final list, though.  It’s been fairly well decided, for example, that seven is the number of team mates at the inception.  Batman, Superman, and Wonder Woman are all certain to be in the film, of course.  Here is the full list of DC superheroes we can (probably) expect to see:

    (more…)


  • There should only be Greeks

    For this month’s Genre spotlight, it’s Greek mythology.  Yes, we’re focusing on Greek mythology as a genre.  Not Greek, Roman, Norse, and all other mythologies; not Greek mythology as a cultural and/or historical force; just Greek mythology as a genre.  Why, you may ask?  And how can we call it a genre?  The answer to each question is in the other.  Greek mythology has much to offer the world in terms of cultural influence and insight into the human heart.  Beyond that, the tales themselves are quite entertaining, with some of the greatest literary characters (and caricatures) finding their roots in them.  Zeus, the great King of the Gods, led his fellow Olympians to victory against their predecessors, the Titans, and began a new era of rule over humanity.  Hades, his brother, ruled the Underworld and all the souls and creatures therein.  Poseidon ruled the seas.  And a pantheon of others ruled with them on Mount Olympus and the realms of the mortals below.

     

    Now, a genre is a hard thing to define.  Some think it’s confined to the big five:  Romance, Mystery, Horror, Sci-fi/Fantasy, and Westerns.  Others look farther back and think of genres as either Comedies, Tragedies, Epics, or Parodies.  I tend to think of a genre as any story that embraces both certain themes and certain settings/physical elements.  So, while you may be writing a story about someone with great power who needs to learn great responsibility, the tiebreaker between a superhero story and a Greek mythological tale will be whether the main character spends time with superpowered mutants or Olympic gods.  Although, in the case of Wonder Woman, they may associate with both.

     

    That’s another reason we’re looking at this particular genre:  its ease of use, you might say, in modern times as well as classical.  Most of you, I’m sure, can name at least one movie, comic book, novel, television show, and/or video game that features a character from Greek mythology.  For those who may need some help, here are a few of the more popular examples from each:

      (more…)


  • Justice League Movie–A Preliminary Treatment

    And things were going so well, too.

    Sure, things have been a little slow for DC Comics lately (compared to Marvel, at least).  With Jonah Hex being the latest in low-tier heroes to bomb at the box office, and with only Green Lantern taking to the screens against three Marvel powerhouses, namely Thor, X-Men: First Class, and Captain America: the First Avenger, it’s only natural to want to kick things into high gear.  And, with The Avengers and The Amazing Spider-Man set to hit theaters in 2012 (not to mention Iron Man 3 at some point), it’s only natural to assume that DC would want to roll out its big guns for the return salvo.  Hence, the long-awaited Justice League movie.  Jeff Robinov, president of the Warner Bros. motion picture group, has revealed that, not only will the Batman character not lie dormant once Christopher Nolan’s trilogy has finished its run, but he’ll be essentially rebooted for inclusion in a Justice League film.  Having spent the last few years fighting production delays including, interestingly, the success of Nolan’s Batman that would have conflicted with a JL-movie Batman (we’ll get to that in a minute), WB is apparently ready to proceed with their answer to the Avengers initiative.

    It’s exciting, to be sure; but isn’t this all a little … too soon?  I mean, it’s not as if DC doesn’t have plenty of characters to tackle in its pantheon of heroes.  A Green Lantern sequel has already been greenlit, so to speak, and the Flash and Wonder Woman movies, as Robinov tells us, are both in development.  While it’s heartening to learn that a WW movie will proceed independent of David E. Kelley’s TV pilot, shouldn’t the JL movie wait until a few more characters are “ready” for it?  We don’t even have any word on the Aquaman movie yet.

    Not that DC hasn’t done a fine job of introducing its heroes to us.  No one, I think, needs a reminder of just who Superman or Batman (or Wonder Woman) are.  The Flash and Green Lantern aren’t as popular, perhaps, but as long as their movies both come out before the JL movie does, I think they’ll be fine.  And, of course, the animated series has introduced us to far more than just the core heroes.  Even people who’ve never read the comics should be somewhat familiar with who the Justice League is, even without introducing them one at a time the way Marvel is doing with the Avengers.  Still, it would be nice to know that each character will receive his or her due with solo films.

    On the other hand, maybe DC figures this is the best way to lead into solo films for certain characters.  Why worry about whether anyone will care about a Martian Manhunter movie if they already loved him in the Justice League movie?  The same is likely true with Hawkman and the Atom, I suppose.  It’s a more cautious approach than Marvel’s of giving Iron Man and Thor their introductory films prior to the Avengers, but it may actually be wiser.  The only problem is, with a film this large and with so much riding on its success, including all those solo films, DC (and Warner Bros.) had better pray it can at least match Marvel’s success.  Historically, that hasn’t always been the case.

    Personally, I feel DC should have waited a little longer; they certainly should have waited longer to make an announcement like this.  With all the casting and production announcements for the Superman and Batman movies, Marvel has actually had to fight for its share of hype for next year.  Speculation on how to “reboot” Batman after The Dark Knight Rises had already begun (of course), but now it’ll be short-circuited a bit since we know it will be as part of a team-up movie.  The announcement that an independent Wonder Woman film is in development would have been enough to keep fanboys like myself in suspense for a decent length of time, especially in conjunction with more Flash movie news.  Moreover, until we know more about how Green Lantern will do in his solo film, pairing him up with even more obscure characters is a risky proposition.  That goes double for our new Superman, as Henry Cavill will likely be tapped to play the leader of the group.

    Giving each hero his or her own movie first allows them to define themselves independent of the group.  While the Justice League cartoon series allowed each character their own time in the spotlight, it was a TV series; they could afford a more leisurely pace to introduce the individuals.  Characters such as Hawkman and Wonder Woman, who have … shall we say intricate mythologies in the DC comics could find it difficult to establish themselves while working alongside better-known characters, like Batman and Superman; or even alongside lesser-known characters, like the Martian Manhunter, who will be trying just as hard to earn their spot on the screen.

    I posted late last year about the timeline I’d follow for releasing movies based on the DC heroes.  It was based on the assumption that most heroes would have their movies produced first, leading up to a Justice League movie (two actually).  It also supposed that the Superman movie would be a trilogy of movies, followed by a “Trinity” movie with Batman and Wonder Woman, which was to be the lead-in for a JL movie.  Sheer stubbornness (I suppose) will be what keeps the “According to Fourth-day” continuity for such a plan intact.  However, just this once, I’m going to write a short treatment for the Justice League movie that comes before the solo movies.

    First, it would need a bit of an origin story for all involved.  Yes, for all of them, including Batman (we’re “rebooting” him, remember?).  Personally, I don’t see Batman as much of a Justice League member.  He formed the Outsiders as a sort of dark shadow of the Justice League, and in the cartoon series he called himself a “part-timer” in the League.  In fact, leaving him out of the movie would have been one way to address the potential problems inherent with having a JL Batman onscreen at the same time as Nolan’s Batman, who lives outside of DC’s continuity anyway (if they even have a “continuity” at this point in time, though some have suggested the Flash movie shares continuity with Green Lantern).  Still, if Batman’s going to be rebooted as a joiner, then he’ll need an introduction of sorts to the team.

    Actually, everyone will; that’s not the main issue.  The issue is, what will bring them together?  It’s simple, really:  an alien invasion (it is still, technically, Alien Invasion Month here at Fourth-day, after all).  We have on our team an intergalactic cop (Hal Jordan, the Green Lantern) tasked with protecting this sector of the galaxy.  We also have J’onn J’onzz, the Martian Manhunter, who acts as a sort of hybrid cop/bounty hunter.  Either one could detect an alien menace threatening the Earth and work to gather its greatest heroes to fight the threat.  And there are no shortages of alien threats to the Earth.

    In an earlier post, I essentially said the problem with nearly all alien invasion movies is the Earthlings don’t have a chance except in the fevered minds of people like M. Night Shyamalan who imagine that aliens are fatally allergic to water (or something like that).  Well, this is one alien invasion movie that doesn’t have to worry about matching Earth forces with the invaders; some of Earth’s greatest heroes happen to be aliens, and have no doubt been providing at least a peek at their technology to our scientists.  While Hal Jordan might not relinquish his ring to Amanda Waller to study, there’s nothing to stop Superman from going to S.T.A.R. Labs with his spacecraft in the hopes of learning more about his heritage.  And who knows what J’onn J’onzz will be willing to do to protect his new home from suffering global genocide like his planet of Mars did so many years ago?

    Now, let’s talk about Wonder Woman and the Amazons.  What better way (other than the one we already suggested) to reintroduce a warrior race to the world they left so long ago than to appoint a champion to liaise with “man’s world” to defend against invaders who threaten all our safety?  Yes, Princess Diana’s “origin story” could be as one chosen to help protect the Earth with weapons and armor forged by the Gods themselves.  Steve Trevor, and, of course, her fellow Amazons, could all be introduced through the war effort.

    And then there’s Aquaman.  While Superman and Wonder Woman patrol the skies, Batman and the Flash cover the ground, and Green Lantern and the Martian Manhunter are in outer space, Aquaman can do what he does best:  protect the seventy percent of Earth that we humans rarely consider.  How better to establish himself as one of Earth’s greatest heroes?  (And, if aliens really are allergic to water, then who better to have at your side?)

    This is actually kind of fascinating.  I can see a massive mobilization effort in the works with this one; in fact, I can see a two-parter.  The only thing left is to pick a villain; one worthy of bringing together the fabled Justice League and lead us into a new era of DC filmmaking.  Who gets to be the lucky alien?  Darkseid?  Even though this post isn’t officially part of AtFd continuity, I’d still like to save him for the Superman trilogy I proposed.  The Starro creature that brought the original Justice League together?  Honestly, I never much cared for it.  Plus, it’s probably too obscure for mainstream audiences to get excited about it; and that goes for Imperiex, as well.  No, I think it’s time to bring in the one hyperintelligent, intergalactic menace who’s threatened Superman and Earth in just about every medium and incarnation to date except in film:  Brainiac.

    That’s about all I’ll post here.  I’m sure DC has plenty of ideas for the movie it no doubt hopes will be its most successful venture to date; and I certainly have more in store for when I write the official “Justice League According to Fourth-day” article (after I’ve written all the others).  For now, let me just say that I hope Warner Bros. and DC take this project far more seriously than they’ve taken some.  And I hope they realize, as Christopher Nolan did, that it’s no sin to adhere to the comics even as you adapt them for a new story.


  • Wonder Woman Costume

    Well, NBC’s released the first image of Adrianne Palicki in full Wonder Woman garb.  What do you think?

    Yeah, me too.

    First, what’s it made of?  ‘Cause, it looks like plastic.  I understand that we’re moving away from the comics and her warrior princess origins, and that everyone is entitled to reimagine things in their own way.  On the other hand, this is supposed to be a serious effort, here.  That suit looks like she bought it at a costume shop.  I’m gratified that NBC has promised a “a serious, non-campy take on the DC Comics character” if the series moves forward, and that David E. Kelley intends to keep the cuffs, the lasso, and the invisible plane.  But this costume, as well as Ms. Palicki wears it, simply will not do.

    Like I said, I get that she’s supposed to be a crime-fighting, corporate exec., “modern woman” who eats ice cream with her girlfriends on the weekends and all that “Sex in the City” jazz, but what about her origins?  She still comes from an island of Amazons, doesn’t she?  And wasn’t her costume supposed to be armor given to her by said Amazons?  Shouldn’t it look more like armor and less like something you’d wear cosplaying?  If not leather and metal, then at least not latex.  Now, maybe I’m wrong and what I’m seeing above isn’t the “original” costume Ms. Palicki’s character was endowed with by her mother the Queen.  Maybe it’s something her “corporate” people made for her to wear to … I don’t know, official crimefighting functions?

    In the last couple of years, Coventry Telegraph has penned a couple of articles featuring images of what Wonder Woman’s armor/costume might actually look like.  One is concept art, and the other is Lois Lane dressed up in an episode of “Smallville”:

    Nice, huh?  Both preserve the red, blue and gold, and the concept art even preserves the stars and eagle.  With just a little bit of tweaking, either one would be great for the smallscreen; or even the bigscreen.

    I’ve done plenty of grouching about the Wonder Woman franchise not being made into a movie, and especially about it being made into (this particular) TV series.  I think about something Zack Snyder said when he began working on the Superman movie:  he said it was “time” for Superman to be loved.  As much as I agree with that statement, Wonder Woman has waited even longer.  Since the end of the 1970′s Wonder Woman TV show, we’ve had four Superman movies hit theaters and several TV adaptations.  We don’t even need to get into the Batman franchise and its success.  Now, we’re bringing Green Lantern, the Flash, and even Lobo to theaters.  And yet, Wonder Woman, the Amazon Princess, one of the longest running and most iconic heroes in all of comic book history, has never had her own major motion picture.  Maybe this new TV series will help; but the more I see, the more I doubt it.

    Update (03/30/2011):

    Okay, so they fixed it (kind of).  The boots are now red (and sensible), the pants are no longer “shiny”, and … well, that’s about it, really.  It still looks like a costume shop deal.

     

    And, not to be ultra-picky, but can we get Adrianne Palicki to stop using that sneer?


  • The Amazon Princess (according to Fourth-day)

    This article has been delayed a few times for different reasons; but, with all the information we’re learning about David E. Kelley’s Wonder Woman television series, it certainly seems like the time to post this.  I once said that, if the new WW series isn’t successful, it would further delay the production of a WW movie.  However, the more we learn about the new TV show, the more convinced I am of two things:  one, that the TV series is intentionally distancing itself as far as it can from the graphic novels; and two, the prospects for a successful faithful Wonder Woman feature film are much brighter because of it (assuming the TV show fails; which would be bittersweet, because no one wants Wonder Woman to fail, ever).

    The problem with creating a faithful Wonder Woman movie are the multiple revisions her history, and the history of her people, the Amazons, have undergone throughout the decades.  To create a modern Wonder Woman (not the modern one Kelley has envisioned, but one who has endured as a character in spite of the changes and challenges of the modern world), a writer needs to be willing to forge a new path that, perhaps paradoxically, adheres to the original mythology and elements.  An example of this process would be Batman Begins and The Dark Knight.  Christopher Nolan demonstrated that you can make something new without discarding the old.

    He also showed that it’s no sin to adapt storylines from actual graphic novels, something that comic book movies seem reluctant to do.  In the case of Wonder Woman, I would adapt the Gods and Mortals storyline.  It was originally published in the 1980′s in the wake of the Crisis on Infinite Earths event, when all the major DC characters were being “rebooted”.  Wonder Woman was shown leaving Themyscira, aka Paradise Island, the home of the Amazons, to be an ambassador to the outside world.  She meets Steve Trevor, Etta Candy, and all of her human friends.  It delves into Greek mythology and the history of the Amazons themselves.  In the hands of artist George Perez, it is considered one of the best chapters in Princess Diana’s history.

    It also introduces the Greek God Ares as a villain in the Wonderverse.  The God of War left Olympus to live in Areopagus, a realm he created for himself.  He has three children, Phobos, Deimos, and Eris, and has attacked the Amazons before.  Ares is perfect as a villain, a link to the Greek mythology that is at the heart of the Wonder Woman mythos, and for underscoring/highlighting Diana’s twin roles as a warrior and an ambassador for peace.  In Gods and Mortals, she had to prevent him from starting a nuclear holocaust, a storyline that could easily be adapted for the modern world.  Theirs would be the perfect topical hero/villain dynamic, just as Batman and the Joker in The Dark Knight were perfect for exploring the effects of terrorism and the lengths to which some would go to fight it.

    To play Wonder Woman, an actress must be intelligent, beautiful, talented, and capable of kicking all kinds of butt.  To me, that suggests exactly one woman:  Emily Deschanel of the TV series Bones.  Her character on the show is a forensic scientist, one who is used to being highly logical; and highly literal.  It’s a character that I could easily see translated into a woman who is sent to live in and defend a world about which she knows very little.  Paradise Island has been isolated from Earth for thousands of years, and Diana’s desire and determination to see this world for herself are traits that, again, are reflected in Ms. Deschanel’s character.  Plus, just look at them:

     

    It’s like the artist who drew her had a picture of Emily Deschanel clipped to his drawing board.  We know she can do action, as her character on Bones is often seen in physical situations, such as climbing, scaling, and yes, even fighting.  She stands at just under six feet, which also gives her an advantage over most other actresses who would be considered for the role.

     

    There are, of course, other roles that need to be filled, especially the two people who matter the most to Princess Diana:  Steve Trevor and her mother, Queen Hippolyta.  My choices for these important characters are Diane Kruger and Bradley Cooper.  Both are popular actors, and both can handle a wide range of roles.  For the role of Etta, her closest human friend, and for her fellow Amazons, I would be comfortable casting new, “unknown” actors, as long as they realized they were there for more than just window dressing.  Every character in the Wonder Woman movie would be an important one.  As for Ares, I’m not exactly sure who I would pick.  Obviously, a character of his stature deserves someone who can be menacing both physically and mentally.  Someone handsome (this is a Greek god, after all), with either a warrior’s build or the potential to attain it.

    Let me be perfectly clear:  this would be a war movie.  No crimefighting, no secret identities, and none of the other superhero “conventions”.  Diana is a warrior princess, from a warrior culture; however, her mandate is to preserve peace.  Again, that may be a bit of a paradox, but it can certainly make for a compelling story.  As an Amazon isolated from the rest of the world, she could immediately cut through/disregard/rise above political correctness and anything else that would cause a “modern man” to hesitate when it comes time to make necessary decisions.  That doesn’t mean, of course, that she can’t respect other people’s viewpoints, cultures, or even their lives.  It does mean that she can be what she’s always been:  an icon; an example to the world.


  • Opposites Attract

    Love in the comics is every bit as hard to find and hold onto as you’d expect.  True lovers, even when they are “meant to be”, are almost never allowed to continue for long.  And the most iconic couples are almost always a pairing of opposites:  Batman and Catwoman, hero and villain; Superman and Lois Lane, alien and human; Vision and Scarlett Witch, robot and mutant.  The same is true for Wonder Woman and her first love, Air Force Major Steve Trevor.

    While they’re both warriors of a sort, they come from very different backgrounds.  Trevor is your plain old average real American hero, and Wonder Woman, aka Princess Diana, is a magical being sculpted from clay and brought to life by the ancient Greek Gods to be a daughter for an immortal queen.  The Amazons of Themyscira haven’t even seen a man, let alone anyone else from the rest of the world, in thousands of years; so it’s quite a culture shock, to say the least, when Steve Trevor crash lands on Paradise Island and Diana has to take him back to the “real world”.

    Who to pair Wonder Woman with has always been a conundrum.  Having grown up on an island completely isolated from the rest of the world, she’s as much an alien on Earth as Superman (at least he was raised among humans).  Perhaps Superman would have been a better match for her, as he’s pretty much the only man on Earth strong enough to meet her as an equal (indeed, the comics have tried to pair them many times).  But, as they say, you can’t help who you fall in love with; and if the rest of us can handle the search for “true love”, then certainly she can.


  • No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.

    Selina Kyle, Wonder Woman, Vicki Vale, Talia al Ghul, Batgirl, Zatanna, Rachel Dawes, Andrea Beaumont, I think even Lois Lane for a while; the list of potential (and actual) loves of Bruce Wayne/Batman’s life just goes on and on.  And yet, he never settles down; at least, not for very long.

    Batman’s mission is to fight crime and protect the innocent.  His unrelenting and singleminded pursuit of this mission seems to paradoxically both draw and repel a host of potential love interests to him.  Heroines, anti-heroines, villainesses, anti-villainesses, and anyone else who may not fit those descriptions have tried to chip away Batman’s armor and draw him out of his self-imposed isolation.

    Sometimes, they succeed.  He’s retired from his life of crimefighting several times, even marrying and having children at times.  However, his retirements never seem to take, and he’s always back on the streets (or rooftops) of Gotham.  Some, like Catwoman, are more than eager to follow him on his late night excursions, which is why they tend to last longer; but eventually, they all come to realize that the mission comes first.


  • What makes a Woman Wonderful?

    With all the movie buzz about the Avengers and various members of the Justice League, you may have missed the news about the (finally) greenlit “Wonder Woman” television series.  Produced by David E. Kelley, who’s known mostly for his courtroom dramas (and dramedies), this is not another cartoon series in the vein of the Paul Dini, Bruce Timm, Alan Burnett “Batman” and “Superman” series (though that wouldn’t have hurt the franchise at all).  Let’s hope it’s not in the vein of “Ally McBeal”, either.

    While we still intend to write an “According to Fourth-day” segment for the (hopefully still) forthcoming Wonder Woman movie, this article is more along the lines of the article we wrote when Zack Snyder was announced as the director of the new Superman movie.  Basically, it’s a “please don’t screw this one up” article.  Wonder Woman has one of the most complex (and convoluted) histories of all of DC’s pantheon of heroes.  It’s part of what’s kept her movie from being produced all these years, despite having such talented writers and directors as Joss Whedon working on the script.  Now, if David E. Kelley knows anything, it’s how to tell a story; but what kind of story does he intend to tell with the Amazon Princess?  For starters, he plans to reinvent the warrior icon as “a vigilante crime fighter in L.A. but also a successful corporate executive and a modern woman trying to balance all of the elements of her extraordinary life.”

    Seriously?  What kind of stuck-in-the-90′s boilerplate language is that?  I know I’m a guy and not very conversant with the state of modern feminism, but haven’t women already proven they can juggle work and private life?  Do people, especially women, still doubt that you can be a “modern” woman, a successful corporate executive, and even a crimefighter all at the same time?  I hate to be cliche, but did anyone ever ask if Bruce Wayne could juggle being a billionaire playboy and a crimefighter?

    And what’s this “crimefighter” business all about?  Did Wonder Woman stop being a warrior-ambassador when I wasn’t looking?  I know Kelley’s trying to reinvent her, but a corporate executive who secretly fights criminals?  I may have to recheck her “rogues gallery”, but I don’t remember a lot of bank robbers on the list (unless they’re bringing back Mouse Man).  Now, if Maxwell Lord is featured, then I can be excited; he’d fit best with this new theme, I would think.  Honestly, though, most of her enemies are either magical beings, renegade Amazons, or just plain Gods, and none of those seem to fit in this reinvention.

    Wired.com wrote an article last week about what the new series should and should not include.  On the list were several mandates for making Wonder Woman (and the actress who plays her) capable of kicking all kinds of butt.  I agree; I cannot stress the “warrior” part of warrior princess enough in this article.  She’s a fighter, always has been, and must always be.  Her main foe was Ares, the God of War, and his handpicked underlings.  How you go from that to a boardroom is not something easily envisioned (unless you take the term “hostile takeover” literally).

    Wired points out that making her an executive can detract from the iconic status she’s enjoyed as a crusader, making her part of the corporate culture that Americans have come to distrust, if not despise, in the last few years.  Even worse, it could roil her into politics, as the business and political worlds have become virtually two sides of the same coin, these days.  As an ambassador from her home country of Themyscira (and a part-time general for the Amazonian army), she could certainly become involved in controversy; but not nearly as much as, say, her face on an advertisement for a political candidate in California to whose campaign her company donated money, or shaking hands with the CEO of a Chinese company that uses child labor, or sitting in court as her business gets sued for the umpteenth time for whatever reason.  Batman can get away with all that because he goes out of his way to make his alter ego, Bruce Wayne, appear as a jerk; but Wonder Woman?

    Like I said, David E. Kelley is a fine storyteller; he wouldn’t have gotten this project if he wasn’t.  I even like his shows (until they start devolving into shouting matches between the leads, which I desperately hope doesn’t happen in this show).  My main issue with creating a Wonder Woman television show is the effect it’ll have on a Wonder Woman (and ultimately a Justice League) movie.  “Smallville” certainly didn’t damage “Superman Returns” or the new “Man of Steel” movie, but that’s because it was successful.  Will we be able to say the same about Wonder Woman?

    Update 02/16/2011:

    At least we now know who will play the Amazon princess/corporate executive/modern woman/crimefighter.  From DC Universe’s “The Source”, we learn that Adrianne Palicki, best known for “Friday Night Lights”, will don the bracelets and tiara (assuming those elements will be featured in the new series).  Aside from her resume, which, all things considered, is a little thin, she has a few things going for her.  She’s a natural athlete, first of all, and stands at just shy of six feet.  That’s important, whether you’re casting an Amazon or a crimefighting vigilante.  We’ve been promised an action show, and Palicki has the potential to deliver just that.  Good luck, Diana.


  • Superheroes that aren’t (according to Fourth-day)

    Marvel and DC both have rosters of heroes (and heroines) numbering in the hundreds, if not thousands.  With the success of Iron Man and Batman, and with all the movies on deck from both companies, including the Flash, Green Lantern, and virtually all of the Avengers, you might wonder why more characters haven’t been given their own chance to shine on the big screen.  Certainly, the hard realities of filmmaking must intrude at some point; just look how long long it took to make Superman Returns.  There’s another factor to consider, though:  the mistrust Hollywood has for the superhero genre.

    It’s easy to understand why movie studios would be wary.  Of the dozens of superhero movies that have been released in the last few decades, only a handful have proven successful to any degree.  On the other hand, only a handful of the main characters portrayed in those films could be considered true superheroes.  It takes more than a costume, superpowers, and an easily identified nemesis to fix your character into the genre.  Many of the most well-known heroes from both Marvel and DC don’t even fit those few criteria.  That hasn’t stopped Hollywood from trying to cram every comic book character they are handed into that mold.  Even when they have a genuine superhero, there’s no guarantee they’ll know what to do with him; or her; or them.

    The best example, perhaps, is the Incredible Hulk.  Played for years on television by Bill Bixby and Lou Ferrigno as the dual sides of one of Marvel’s most tragic figures, the character of the Hulk was rarely portrayed as a “superhero”.  The villains of the show were usually generic lowlifes and thugs, with nothing that could be said to classify them as “supervillains”.  The long story arc of the series, culminating in the TV-movie special “The Death of the Incredible Hulk” was one of an accidental crusader at best, an itinerant do-gooder who couldn’t settle anywhere.  Steering clear of all the conventions of the genre helped create a much more sympathetic character, in both the vagabond doctor and the vicious monster.  Audiences grew to love both sides of the tragic hero, and they didn’t need a showdown with the Abomination for that to happen.  Despite the lack of (almost) anything resembling the comics in the highly popular TV series, both recent Hulk movies have attempted to fit him back into the superhero mold, giving him showdowns with supervillains and even the U.S. Army.  We can only guess, at this point, how his character will fare in next year’s Avengers movie.

    Another example of a superhero that isn’t is Batman, the Caped Crusader.  It’s not the lack of superpowers that bars him from qualifying, but rather the nature of his work.  He’s a detective who uses forensics and deduction to capture criminals (albeit strangely-costumed ones).  In Batman, the first Michael Keaton movie, he spent as much time investigating and unraveling the Joker’s schemes as he did directly confronting him; the same was true in The Dark Knight, and in the 1960′s TV series with Adam West.  The franchise has only floundered when it has moved away from this dynamic, that of balancing crime-solving with crime-fighting.  Despite all the gadgets, themed villains, and fight scenes, Batman is best-loved not when he’s “dark and gritty”, but when he’s filling the role of “the world’s greatest detective”.

    There are plenty of other examples of when movies have handled comic book characters well, and when they’ve handled them poorly.  Looking at it through the lens of placing characters in the correct genres helps identify most of the real problems with those movies.  Jonah Hex, as we’ve discussed before, would have been much better if it had been treated as a straightforward Western movie.  A lot of the disappointment with 2009′s Watchmen movie is that audiences came expecting a superhero movie but got something else (which is how the series was always intended).  Looking ahead to this summer, it looks as though the new Captain America movie is shaping into quite the period war movie, and that can only help.  Comics were never meant to present us with only one type of hero; there have been detective stories, romances, adventures, comedies, and war stories in the pages of Marvel, DC, and many other comics.  There’s no reason to think they can’t be treated as such on the screen as well as on the page.

    Here is a list of some “superheroes” from both Marvel and DC that shouldn’t be treated as such when and if they receive their own movies.  Some of these, we will write about in greater lengths in the months ahead:

    WONDER WOMAN - No one doubts that the Amazon Princess fits the definition of superhero(ine), but that doesn’t mean her movie should be written as one.  Like Batman and the Incredible Hulk, she had her own TV series, and in it she proved that she could fight for truth, justice, and everything else in a more “standard” way.  A Wonder Woman movie should include a mix of war, espionage, and diplomacy, presenting challenges to Princess Diana in each of her roles as a warrior and ambassador for her people to the outside world.  The themes of war and diplomacy are certainly topical ones in any age and should be handled carefully; even when something isn’t intended as a metaphor for real life events (and people), that won’t necessarily stop a large number of people from believing that it is.  No one wants an icon like Wonder Woman reduced to “taking sides” in a global conflict; but she can still be an icon, an ideal for our time.

    AQUAMAN – Many have said that Aquaman, despite being one of the oldest and most easily recognized of the DC heroes, is not a top-tier hero, or even a second-tier hero.  When it comes to fighting villains on land, they are correct.  However, Aquaman isn’t meant to be a land-based hero, but a sea-based one; and in a world that is seventy-percent ocean, his power is greater, relatively speaking, than most land-based heroes.  Aquaman’s “origin story” isn’t that of a typical superhero.  His quest isn’t to fight injustice or protect the helpless (though he may do those things anyway); it’s to return to his home in Atlantis, from which he was exiled and of which he is the rightful heir.  We’ve seen and heard this story told since before the days of King Arthur, and it’s one that other superhero movies are already utilizing (see Thor).  To set such a story undersea could be quite the new angle.

    POWER PACK - Not every movie needs to be for adults.  Children watch movies, too, and the Children/YA Fantasy Adventure genre is certainly growing. First published back in the mid 80s and retaining a cult following to this day, Marvel’s Power Pack told the story of the Power children, the pre-teen offspring of a scientist couple who saved the universe from reptilian aliens, gaining amazing powers in the process.  Despite the cutesy-sounding premise, the series took itself quite seriously, with the Power kids more often than not having adventures that would have tested the best and brightest of Marvel’s adult heroes.  Obviously, Pixar would be the prime choice to bring this film off, but a live action version could work as well as long as Disney treats the characters with respect.

    THE GREAT LAKES AVENGERS – Marvel Studios has been foreshadowing an Avengers film since the first Iron Man movie came out a few years back.  But there’s been several teams to bear that moniker over the years, including the hard-luck heroes of America’s mid-west.  Mister Immortal (his power:  He can die!  But, he’ll eventually come back), Flatman (powers:  He’s flat!  And yes, he’s often confused with Reed Richard), Big Bertha (she’s a super-model who can become super-strong when she overeats; no, really), Doorman (he can create portals in things; he’s just not very good at it), and the sublime Squirrel Girl (has the powers of a squirrel, and an uncanny rapport with all squirrels) have been trying to save the world for years.  And sometimes, just sometimes … they manage to pull it off.  Everyone loves the underdog hero; that’s why Spider-Man is so popular.  And the GLA manage to make Spidey look blessed by angels.  This wouldn’t be an underdog superhero movie so much as it would be a tragic comedy (tragicomedy?).

    DAMAGE CONTROL - Ever wonder how one week, a giant robot can rampage through New York City, the Lava Men can break through the turf of Central Park, and the Dread Dormammu can rain hellfire and demons from the skies above onto Times Square … but by the next week, everything’s back to normal?  Well, Marvel Earth has a little company called Damage Control.  They clean up after every hero and villain slugfest, every alien invasion, every time a giant mutation from the ocean’s deep comes to the surface and wrecks havoc “just to feel something”.  While chronically over-worked, they’re also one of the most lucrative businesses in the world.  Done right, this could be the next Ghostbusters.  One of the things that’s made the Marvel movies so popular is their willingness to hang lamp-shades and indulge in self aware humor.  We’re betting an entire film of such material just might be a hit in the comedy genre.

    AGENTS OF ATLAS – Before the Avengers, there were the Avengers (no, we don’t mean John Steed and Emma Peel).  Back in the 1950s, Marvel was mostly a monster comic company.  And it wasn’t even called Marvel, it was called Atlas.  They did have a few oddball characters who might vaguely be considered heroic.  There was Marvel Boy, the super-hero from Uranus.  There was Venus, the goddess of love.  There was Jimmy Woo, secret agent (a very rare case where an Asian American was shown as heroic).  During the 1970s, someone wrote a story where these and other 1950s-era Marvel characters formed a mighty team of Avengers, some years before the actual Avengers were around.  But the story ended with the heroes being forced to disband, the claim being put forth that the world was not yet ready for such a combination.

    While only a one-shot, the idea refused to ever really die.  A few years ago, writer Jeff Parker brought the team back in the critically acclaimed Agents of Atlas graphic novel, in which a rejuvenated, amnesiac Jimmy Woo must reunite with his band of long-forgotten heroes to save the world from a mysterious organization so vast, so powerful that only the name of the god who supports the World on his shoulders seems a suitable moniker:  The Atlas Foundation.  And each member of the team conforms to one of the great pulp adventurer archetypes:  a Secret Agent; a Spaceman; a Mermaid; a Robot; a Goddess; and an Immortal Talking Gorilla.  Together, the Agents can and do go off on bizarre adventures into realms of weirdness that few Marvel heroes can equal.  Give it to a visionary director, who can combine weird science whimsy and gut-wrenching peril with genuine emotional involvement.  So, really, we want to give this to Spielberg as he was thirty years ago, but I’m sure a suitable substitution can be found.

    As you can see, there are many different paths Marvel and DC could take and have taken with their characters.  We don’t need every comic book character who makes it to the big screen to save the day; sometimes, it’s enough that they make us laugh, or even cry.  We don’t need a showdown between Wolverine and Sabretooth to make us cheer; those fights help, but they’re not what make the movies great.  Fiction can entertain and enlighten us in so many ways, and getting caught up in the questions like “who’s the archnemesis” or “what kind of powers does everyone have” keeps us from seeing the types of movies we could.  Comics have such a rich and diverse array of genres, and, if anything, that is what should make it onto the big screen.

    - Stephen Monteith and John Ellis contributed to this article



  • Recent Posts

  • Features

  • Reviews

  • Interviews

  • Polls

  • Events

    No events
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • dinamic_sidebar 4 none

©2013 fourthdayuniverse.com Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)  Raindrops Theme